ABSTRACT
The extent to which chromatin of rat caput (CAP), corpus (COR), cauda (CAU) spermatozoa undergo condensation and compaction is known to be a function of progressive increase in the formation of inter- as well as intra-protamine disulphide bridges during their transit through the epididymis. Relative compaction undergone by the nuclear chromatin of these sperm populations was studied by monitoring their susceptibility to in vitro decondensation induced by varying concentrations (0, 0.01, 1, 5, 10, 50 mM) of disulphide reducing agent, dithiothreitol (DTT) after an initial exposure to 0.01% papain. Following this treatment and staining with the nucleic acid specific fluorochrome, ethidium bromide (EB), it was observed that irrespective of the epididymal region from which they were collected, spermatozoa exhibited DTT dose-dependent (a) increase in nuclear size as seen under fluorescence microscopic examination, (b) decrease in flow cytometrically quantifiable light scatter parameters--forward scatter (FSc, 'nuclear size') and side scatter (SSc, nuclear 'granularity'), (c) increase in individual cell EB binding when analyzed by DNA flow cytometry, and (d) increase in thiol specific 14C-iodoacetamide (14C-IA) uptake. The decrease in both FSc and SSc occurring in spite of actual increase in nuclear size has been attributed to increase in translucency of spermatozoan nuclei consequent to decondensation. The FSc, SSc and EB bindability were studied by monitoring both the channels of maximal cell concentration detected in the flow cytograms as well as by digitally quantitating the numbers of cells within specific channels (1-64, 65-128, 129-192 and 193-256) of the flow cytogram. The latter indicated a measure of the variability in the response of populations of sperm within each sample to DTT induced decondensation. At any given concentration of DTT, especially between 5-10 mM, the differences observed between sperms of different regions were consistent and significant (P < 0.01-P < 0.001), maximal changes being shown by CAP and minimal by CAU sperm, COR sperm appearing in between. The effective concentration of DTT required to elicit 50% of maximal (i.e. that exhibited by CAP sperm when taken as 100%) effect (ED50) varied significantly among CAP, COR and CAU sperms for each of the parameters studied (P < 0.01-P < 0.001). It is concluded that the differences observed among the three epididymal sperm populations are due to differences in the extent of susceptibility to decondensation in vitro and that this is dependent upon the variation in the -S-S-content of their chromatin during different stages of epididymal transit. All the parameters used (with the exception of fluorescence microscopy) can be quantified and as all of them show a similar dose dependency to DTT treatment, any one of these parameters can be conveniently used to determine the mature/immature status of the sperms voided. Application of such a method to determine the quality of sperms voided by man appears feasible.